Author: Ed

  • Telstra Easytouch 4G Review

    BLANK
    Welcome to the 2012 Telstra Easytouch 4G ( T82) mobile phone review. For Christmas 2012 Telstra and ZTE have released 'bargain' priced reasonably high specified Android smartphone. The new Easytouch 4G release took us by surprise, likewise the smaller Telstra Frontier model. The Easytouch 4G is currently only available on a monthly plan at around $35. The Telstra Easytouch 4G at first use is a great experience. In terms of construction the overall build quality is very good. The only thing we can comment on was that the metal surround looked a little 'cheap' and a little on the toy side in terms of feel but better than the original iPhone though! and clearly much better than the models we've seen from Telstra in the past 12 months. In terms of hardware specification, the Easytouch 4G's CPU is fast likewise the graphics system. The screen is the 4.3 which is a reasonable size and above the average. There is nothing deficient or particularly low end abut the phone which is nice change. The technology is about the level of the Samsung Galaxy SII. In terms of operation the  user interface is often where the Telstra phones fall down. However we can thankfully say that Easytouch 4G interface works really well and that's due purely to the fast CPU. There are a few customisations we noticed apart from the large menu widgets on its Android (Jelly bean) version of the software. In fact there are only a few image transition effects which were missing. Presumably this is why Apple is suing every other phone company for. It is a bit rich coming from a company that out right copied the clock design of the Swiss clock. What else have Apple copied that they haven't owned up to yet? Regardless we really don't care about legal battles and you won't miss the power hungry effects. There are plenty of Apps in the Google Play store these days and there is always something new to try. Admittedly some apps though are quite old and primitive to look at . Of note is that the Angry Birds games are free. Overall the Telstra Easytouch 4G is definitely the best model released by the company under its own branding for the Christmas 2012 period but we understand there are better ones planned for 2013. The Easytouch will do everything you want with the speed and stability you expect on another brand name smartphone. It appears to be almost as polished as any other phone running Andriod 4.0 - but at a cheaper price on a monthly plan. It is the best one we've tested from Telstra to date. Forget the other cheaper Telstra Urbane, Uno etc.. Just remember to compare the Nokia 800 and 900 which run Windows Phone 7.5 you may change your mind since they are now priced the same even on plans. Specifications
    • Telstra Easytouch 4G T82
    • Network Tri-band GSM 900/1800/1900 Mhz Tri-band 3G 850/2100 Mhz 4G LTE 1800/2600 Mhz HSDPA 7.2 Mbps data speed (download) HSUPA 2 Mbps (upload) 4G LTE 1000Mbps 50 down Mbps Up
    • Design Touch screen
    • L120 x W63.6 x D108 mm
    • Weight 140 grams
    • Display/s 4.3 inch 540 x 960 pixel
    • Camera 8MP LED Flash Forward camera 1MP
    • Video Camera 640x 480 pixels @ 15fps
    • Connectivity Wi-Fi Bluetooth V3
    • CPU 1.5 Ghz Dual core 'Krait' Separate Adreno 225 Graphic CPU
    • Memory Up to 2.5 Gig for user Up to 32Gig micro-SD expansion
    • Ring tones MIDI, MP3, Video, vibration and others
    • Features A-GPS AndroidApp store Free Google Navigator (requires data plan) FM Radio Compass Accelerometer Proximity Ambient Light Music and Media player MS-Word, Excel and Powerpoint, PDF, ZIP compatible Organiser/Calender SMS, MMS, IM, Email Speaker Phone/Hands free Li-Po 1900 mAh battery Up to 300 hours Standby Up to 6.5 hours Talk Time
    • Price history Approx $35 AUD December 2012 (Plan only)

  • Apple iPhone 4S Review

    iphone4

    Welcome to the Apple iPhone 4S review. Although we've been using a 4S for nearly 12 months, once again we don't have anything new to add to the world full of glowing 4S reviews. The iPhone is the most efficient smartphone for the majority of users in the world but it is definitely not perfect and the competition is catching up and in many cases surpassing the ease and functionality offered by the 4S. Since it is such a great phone we see little point in pointing out its good points since they are well known.

    So here's our opinion and why you should NOT buy the iPhone 4S and consider another mobile phone:

    1 - Micro-SIM makes it incompatible with 90% of other phones for now...
    2 - poor voice quality, signal reception and call quality is all below much cheaper phones.
    3 - its overly expensive despite last generation hardware apart from the screen.
    4 - retina display is detailed but has poor color reproduction eg. washed out
    5 - it is true! the screen on the front and back shatter very easily.
    6 - camera still produces fake over and under saturated lacking detail pictures compared to the ancient Nokia N8.
    7 - must look at screen to type.
    8 - limited user interface customisation.
    9 - requires ugly additional case to prevent damage
    10 - no expandable memory and paying over $100 for 16Gis is simply ripping you off.
    11 - everything requires an internet to work
    12 - it does track you for almost every app you use and call you make
    13 - the screen IS tiny for an expensive phone
    14 - everyone has got one.

    If you like to buy apps, videos and music with some web browsing than the iPhone is the best there is. Unfortunately thanks to brewing legal action (2011) the company is attempting to get rid of the opposition which they can't buy out. They bought SIRI for example and claimed it for them selves - its pretty sad really. Apple didn't invent the mobile phone - they made certainly made it so much better but basing legal action on the shape of phone and their improvements like icon designs is essentially a joke only the US legal system can be put through. I wonder whether they paid Nokia and Motorola for all the tech they essentially stole the IP from in the first place?

    Regardless if you can afford the iPhone 4s go for it i it still is one of the best phones you can get! However watch out for the Androids... HTC and Samsung which do much more.

    Specifications

    • Apple iPhone 4S
    • Network
      Quad-band GSM 850/900/1800/1900
      Tri-band 3G 850/900/1900/2100
      HSDPA 7.2 data speed (download)
    • Design
      Touch screen
    • L115.2 x W58.6 x D9.3mm
      Weight 140 grams
    • Display/s
      External TFT 640 x 960
    • Camera
      8MP
      LED Flash
    • Video Camera
      640 x 480 30 fps
    • Connectivity
      Wi-Fi
      Bluetooth V4
    • CPU
      ARM Cortex A8 1 Ghz
      Graphics: PowerVR MBX-Lite
    • Memory
      From 8-32Gig
    • Ring tones
      Purchase or iStudio only and vibration
    • Features
      A-GPS
      Accelerometer
      Gyrometer
      Compass
      Proximity sensor
      Multi-touch screen
      Music and Media player
      Remote security
      Contacts/Organiser/Calender
      SMS, MMS, IM, Email
      Speaker Phone/Hands free
      Battery 1420 mAh
      Up to 300 hours Standby
      Up to 12 hours Talk Time
    • Price history
      From $679 AUS 2012 (Outright)
      From $879 AUS 2011 (Outright)

  • Apple iPhone 4 Review

    hyp4mhz
    Welcome to the Apple iPhone 4 review (We know its a bit late - someone forgot to hit the post button). The iPhone 4 was released in mid 2010 was proper upgrade to the 3GS. The iPhone 4 looks good  and great to hold thus consequently a best sellor. Due to the popularity of the iPhone we really cannot add anything more to the review and comparison world for this phone. It is a lovely phone that does almost everything you want and very simple to use. The software make network connections quickly and the web browser are state of the art when released in 2010. Apart from construction materials which are beyond anything the competition, apart from Vertu or course there are no innovative features in terms of software. The iPhone 4 is not perfect but its is the best there is for the masses when released. Since it is such a great phone here's our opinion and why you should consider another mobile phone: 1 - Micro-SIM makes it incompatible with 99% of other phones for now... 2 - poor voice quality, signal reception and call quality is not good. 3 - its overly expensive despite last generation hardware apart from the screen. 4 - retina display is detailed but has poor color reproduction eg. washed out. 5 - camera still produces fake over saturated pictures. 6 - must look at screen to type. 7 - limited customisation 8 - requires ugly additional case to prevent damage 9 - cannot add more memory 10 - everyone has got one. If you like apps, videos and music with some web browsing than the iPhone is the best there is. Unfortunately thanks to brewing legal action (2010) the company is attempting to get rid of the opposition. Apple didn't invent the phone - they made certainly made it so much better but basing legal action on the shape of phone and their improvements like icon designs is essentially a joke only the US legal system can be put through. I wonder whether they paid Nokia and Motorola which they essentially stole the IP from? Regardless if you can afford the iPhone 4 go for it! However watch out for the Androids... Specifications
    • Apple iPhone 4
    • Network Quad-band GSM 850/900/1800/1900 Tri-band 3G 850/1900/2100 HSDPA 7.2 data speed (download)
    • Design Touch screen
    • L115.2 x W58.6 x D9.3mm Weight 137 grams
    • Display/s External TFT 640 x 960
    • Camera 5MP
    • Video Camera 640 x 480 30 fps
    • Connectivity Wi-Fi Bluetooth V2.1 Custom
    • CPU ARM Cortex A8 1 Ghz Graphics: PowerVR MBX-Lite
    • Memory From 8-32Gig
    • Ring tones Purchase or iStudio only and vibration
    • Features A-GPS Accelerometer Proximity sensor Multi-touch screen Music and Media player Remote security Contacts/Organiser/Calender SMS, MMS, IM, Email Speaker Phone/Hands free Battery 1420 mAh Up to 300 hours Standby Up to 12 hours Talk Time
    • Price history From $459 AUD 2010 (Outright) From $879 AUD 2010 (Outright)

  • Telstra Roamer Review

    hyp4mhz
    Welcome to the 2012 Telstra Roamer (T116a) review. The Roamer is the latest revision to the candy bar style mobile phone for the masses. It has the essential functions you need for basic  communications and not much more. It's only capable of voice - TXT - MMS - (very limited) email. The Roamer is available as a pre-paid package for under $30! The Telstra Roamer is a great phone for basic use - no more no less. We looked at it for less than a minute and can say it works fine. There are no features which the T116a can boast to be a convincing purchase. However it is relatively over priced because  Nokia,Samsung and other Telstra models have got brilliant phones with more stuff for the same price many with dual SIM and international coverage thanks to additional frequencies for a few dollars more! Eg. Sony-Ericsson Cedar (easily the better phone) can now be purchased for $39 or even $29 dependent on how the physical stores are desperate to clear them. Our conclusion is: avoid the Telstra Roamer T116a unless truly desperate or you want a freebie for a Telstra SIM. Specifications
    • Telstra Roamer (T116a)
    • Network Quad-band GSM 900/1800 Quad-band 3G 850 HSDPA 3.6 Mbps HSUPA 2 Mbps
    • Design Candybar
    • L110 x W47.5 x D11.8 mm Weight 70 grams
    • Display/s 2.0 inch TFT 176 x 220
    • Camera 0.3
    • Video Camera N/A
    • Connectivity N/A
    • Bluetooth N/A
    • Micro-USB
    • CPU N/A Mhz
    • Memory Up to 20MB available to user MicroSD up to 32Gig
    • Ring tones MIDI, MP3, Video, vibration and others
    • Features JAVA Apps Music and Media player Organiser/Calender SMS, MMS, IM, Email JAVA MIDP 2.0 Speaker Phone/Hands free 3.5mm AV/headset ZTE 820mAh Up to 10 days Standby Up to 3 hours Talk Time
    • Price history Under $30 AUD October 2012 (Pre-paid only)

  • Telstra Uno Review

    hyp4mhz
    Welcome to the 2012 Telstra Uno (T12) review page. The Uno is a pre-paid package priced at around $90-100, making it one of the cheapest Android based mobile phone handsets and presumably a replacement for the older Smart Touch series released last year. When these types of low end or base model smart phones where released last year they were a revelation in being very low price and reasonable specification. However 12 months on they are showing many flaws which have made them largely unwanted. The Telstra/ZTE in particular have not invested enough time in optimising the hardware and Android software  resulting in noticeably lower user experience with lags and sluggishness Eg. Telstra Urbane despite the 1Ghz CPU. The Uno is not exempt using a dated Android 2.3 software when the world is up to version 4. In the few minutes we spent with the Uno we where underwhelmed with its construction and operation, preferring the HTC Wildfire S for a mere $20-30 more as a pre-paid package. The HTC Wildfire S easily exceeds the Telstra's Uno construction and user experience. In fact the Wildfire S is a better experience than even the current top range Telstra Urbane. Back to the UNO - expect the Uno's price to around the $50 mark in a few months and see if you are still interested.. Specifications
    • Telstra UNO (T12)
    • Network Quad-band GSM 900/1800/1900 Dual-band 3G 850/2100 HSDPA 7.2 Mbits data speed (download) Not mentioned data speed (upload)
    • Design Resistive Touch screen
    • L104 x W56 x D13.3 mm Weight 99 grams
    • Display/s External 2.8 Inch TFT 240 x 320 pixels
    • Camera 2MP
    • Video Camera 320x480 15FPS
    • Connectivity Wi-Fi Bluetooth V3
    • CPU 650Mhz
    • Memory Up to 150MB available to user 2GB MicroSD card included MicroSD up to 32Gig
    • Ring tones MIDI, MP3, vibration and others
    • Features Accelerometer FM Radio Music and Media player Organiser/Calender SMS, MMS, IM, Email Speaker Phone/Hands free Li-Po 1100mAh battery Up to 200 hours Standby Up to 150 minutes Talk Time
    • Price history Under $99 AUD October 2012 (Pre-paid)

  • Apple iOS Vs Android Vs Microsoft Windows Phone

    hyp4mhz
    We often get asked which is our favorite OS for our mobile phone so we decided to do a our first real article and comparison on the big three mobile phone operating systems and some hardware as well! None of the companies send us anything but media releases so there is not bias unlike the majority of commercial websites. In fact there is not interest other than our own. Before continuing we would like to make it clear what our primary choice operating system is: iOS and the Apple iPhone but it has nothing to do with iOS itself but its ability to run apps and music. If Apple had not provided this ease to access to content (music & movies) for mostly a reasonably price we would definitely choose another type of mobile phone. (We currently use Android for our secondary phones!) However we can announce our intention to change to Windows in the next 12 months so we can write up the latest on this 'new' OS. Apart from the apps and content we like Apple's iOS because it's simple and responsive but it is looking very tired in 2012, it has next to no customisation options and very few display settings you can adjust. The much hyped retina display produces details but the images are washed out, opposite of the camera's photos which produce fake over saturated colours. SIRI is the most interesting voice recognition program to date but since it needs the internet to work makes it no more useful than prior attempts. Apple's new maps software is also primitive and huge step backwards form the Google version. It is also annoying to use because once the single button wears out there is very little you can do, especially so when only 12 month into a 24 month contract. Furthermore the lack of a replaceable battery, small screen and no expandable memory is marketing genius but people aren't stupid and will choose alternate phones in a next year or two. We love Android OS for smartphones! much more so than Apple iOS or Windows Phone OS. Simply because the user interface can be made as simple or as complex as you wish. There are plenty of customisation options on Android to play with and plenty of apps to install. Some of the manufacturer's custom Android enhancements and larger screen and superior voice call and reception namely by HTC make it the only choice. (We have a laugh when Apple boasts that it has 3 microphones in the iPhone5 - that's because it really needs it due to lower voice and sound quality in prior iPhones - and honestly it doesn't sound any better) Android's media capabilities are amazing for a mobile phone.  It can play virtually any main stream audio and video format you care to think and one of the key selling points. Finally there are so many options and models to choose from that it makes shopping fun again together with the ability to be an individual. The only problem is that its music is not available in this country otherwise we'd switch immediately. As for Windows Phone OS: it is relatively simple to use, has a great browser and connectivity with Outlook, LIVE and Hotmail, polished apps but next to no customisation options. There are only a few but significant issues we have with all versions a this stage. Firstly none of the models have expandable memory and next there are very few models to choose from. It also takes a bit longer to work out how to do things beyond the basics even adding tiles and a world clock was an interesting experience. Considering that Microsoft has chosen not to allow any but a few insignificant mods to the user interface is a disappointment along with poor media player and lack of apps or cheap content reeks of Apple's monopoly like attitude to phones users which is definitely why it this OS will never be popular as the others. So that's what we think.

  • HTC One XL review

    hyp4mhz
    Welcome to the 2012 HTC One XL review. It 's been a long time since we've tested an HTC phone due to the lack of any interesting models to write about.  However with the release of this model things have changed. In fact we think that the One XL is indeed one of the best Android based smart phones. Unfortunately it still priced quite high being the current top of the range model but at least it works and feels like it! At the time of writing the One XL was selling for $668 outright. Note that the difference between the HTC One X and the One XL is the different CPU but just as quick, 4G and color availability. The One X is available in white and the One XL in grey, we prefer the grey version. The HTC One XL construction and build quality is excellent, light enough and very solid. The curved screen edges and frame give it a comfortable 'built' for long term use. The HTC feels like its made of an exotic material not plastic or metal due to the coating and can only be described as very cool. Sure it might smooth out over time but first impressions do count for lots. We're sure that most will probably buy some sort of case for it regardless.The 4.7 inch screen is big enough and the screen image quality is very good too. It may not be the leading edge AMOLED screen but it is better than the iPhone4S in terms of real life color re-production. The only thing missing is a microSD card memory expansion. The overall size of the phone is not too big or small... In terms of operation the HTC One XL has the latest version of Android and the customised interface called 'HTCsense' which is the best set of modifications we've  seen on an Android phone. The menus are 99% smooth with only heavy duty widgets causing micro second delays with updates from the main screen as per any Android OS phone everywhere else there is literally nothing else to really complain about. Like most HTC models it has the Beats sound enhancement and it makes the best music player out of any mobile phone we've heard to date. Sure it doesn't have all the latest software features like the Samsung Galaxy S3 but you probably won't miss them. In all honestly the ability to run widgets on the main menu screens (for any andriod OS phone) with just a flick of the finger is a fantastic feature instead of trying to find the app icon running it than closing etc.. is now strangely annoying. The only problem we found on the One XL was it's relatively low battery life, lasting a mere 1.5 days with minimal usage. In the end we think the HTC One XL is the best value top end Android OS based smart phones to date. It has a very slick and speedy interface with amazing options. It does everything the newly released and still outdated iPhone 5 can do and more, with a much more impressive interface. It almost matches the Samsung Galaxy S3. We think the One XL is a great buy, priced less than the currently leading Samsung Galaxy S3. Specifications
    • HTC One X
    • Network Quad-band GSM 850/900/1800/1900 Quad-band 3G 850/900/1900/2100 Single band 4G LTE
    • Design Touch screen L134.36 x W69.9 x D8.9 mm
    • Weight 130 grams
    • Display/s 4.7 inch 1,280 x 720
    • Camera 8MP auto-focus LED Flash 2nd forward facing video call camera 1.3MP (720p)
    • Video Camera 1080p high definition 30FPS main video camera
    • Connectivity Wi-Fi Bluetooth V4 NFC DLNA GSM and 3G networks
    • CPU 1.5 Ghz Quad Core Separate Graphic CPU
    • Memory 1Gig RAM 32Gig for user
    • Features
    •  A-GPS Gyro sensor Proximity sensor Digital compass Ambient light sensor FM Radio with RDS Ring tones: MIDI, MP3, Video, vibration and others AndroidApp store Beats Audio Music and Media player Organiser/Calender SMS, MMS, IM, Email Speaker Phone/Hands free
    • Battery Li-Po 1,800 mAh battery Up to xxx hours Standby Up to xx hours Talk Time
    • Price history Under $650 AUD late 2012 (Outright)

  • Telstra Urbane T22 Review

    hyp4mhz
    Welcome to the 2012 Telstra Urbane T22 mobile phone review. Finally we have Android smart phone from Telstra/ZTE that can compete with the other manufacturers on features and user experience and not purely on a cheap price.  Regular and non-smart phones from Telstra are usually basic but pretty good however all their Android smart phones so far have major performance flaws or interface issues that we could only recommend based on price. In some cases not recommend at all. The pre-paid Urbane T22 package is priced at cheap and tempting $149. The Telstra Urbane uses a 1GHZ CPU, decent sized screen but relatively low resolution that is OK to look at but the latest Android 4.0 software with minimal enhancements – which is good. The plastic case is definitely not high end but feels mid range and well made. However at this sort of price tag there are shortfalls in the other areas that include the basic screen resolution and quality, basic 3Mp camera and VGA video recording. In terms of operation the Urbane T22 is pretty smooth (there are noticeable lags) and not fast as you would expect. The 1Ghz CPU does wonders for the user experience compared to prior models. However it is still not as smooth as say the HTC Wildfire which has a slower CPU. However with the decent web browser, A-GPS and even an FM radio there's very little that majority will miss. Personally they should have included a better camera for the Facebook generation and possibly drop the FM radio. The standard web browser allows you to visit any site even with Flash based content - however it will not run complex games like those on Facebook. The Telstra Urbane is a pretty good smart phone and the best Telstra branded models we've tested to date. At a very cheap pre-paid price of $149 you can definitely consider it as replacement for your old keypad phone. The T22's hardware does not appear to be optimized for the latest Android due to the lags we encountered on it but not other Android phones. Sure Android has its issues but no more than the iPhone but at least it can do everything that a iPhone or Nokia's as examples can do. Forget all the other pre-paid mobile phones from Telstra the Urbane T22 is to date, one of the cheapest hence best value most fully featured mobile phone you can buy! Specifications
    • Telstra Urbane T22
    • Network Tri-band GSM 900/1800/1900 Mhz Tri-band 3G 850/900/1900 (dependent on country) HSDPA 14.4 Mbps data speed (download) HSUPA 2 Mbps (upload)
    • Design Touch screen
    • L120 x W63.6 x D108 mm
    • Weight 140 grams
    • Display/s 4 inch 480 x 800
    • Camera 3MP LED Flash Forward camera 120 x 160
    • Video Camera 640x 480 pixels
    • Connectivity Wi-Fi Bluetooth V2.1
    • CPU 1 Ghz Single core Separate Graphic CPU
    • Memory Up to 2.5 Gig for user Up to 32Gig micro-SD expansion
    • Ring tones MIDI, MP3, Video, vibration and others
    • Features A-GPS AndroidApp store Free Google Navigator (requires data plan) Compass Accelerometer Dolby Digital Proximity Ambient Light Music and Media player MS-Word, Excel and Powerpoint, PDF, ZIP compatible Organiser/Calender SMS, MMS, IM, Email Speaker Phone/Hands free Li-Po 1600 mAh battery Up to 200 hours Standby Up to 4 hours Talk Time
    • Price history Approx $149 AUD Mid 2012 (Pre-paid)

  • LG Optimus L3 Review

    hyp4mhz
    Welcome to the LG Optimus L3 review. A mid 2012 release from LG, this phone is targeted at the prepaid market and priced at an attractive $99. The Optimus L3 is one of the first in a new series of mobile phones from the company that has fallen way behind in the design and marketing of these devices. They even had the nerve to blame the OS in particular Windows Phone for their failure. This of course was only vaguely true since every single phone design they had was pretty sad along with outdated versions of their OS. In terms of construction the L3 one of the best built models priced so low.  The standout features include a great feeling and solid metal case despite the lightness and  the screen is more square than the normal rectangle. Unfortunately it is let down by the choice of a very basic screen resolution which is way out of date by 12 months. In terms of operation the Optimus L3 is quite fast and  slick. Just don't run too many apps at once though. It can do almost everything the more high end mobile phones can models can do. The LG Optimus L3 is a great little phone with the only issues of having an old version of Android and a low resolution screen. We wish LG had installed a better resolution screen. If it were at the same price point and had a 480 x 640 screen we would have it on our must buy list for 2012... Specifications
    • LG Optimus L3
    • Network Quad-band GSM 850/900/1800/1900 Tri-band 3G 850/2100 (dependent on country) HSDPA 3.2 Mbps data speed (download) HSUPA 2 Mbps (upload)
    • Design Touch screen slider
    • L190.1 x W120.5 x D12 mm
    • Weight 109 grams
    • Display/s 3.2 inch 240 x 320
    • Camera 3.2MP LED Flash
    • Video Camera 480 x 640 pixels
    • Connectivity Wi-Fi Bluetooth V2.1
    • CPU 800 Ghz
    • Memory Up to 2 Gig for user Up to 32Gig micro-SD expansion
    • Ring tones MIDI, MP3, Video, vibration and others
    • Features A-GPS AndroidApp store Free Google Navigator (requires data plan) Compass Accelerometer Dolby Digital Proximity Ambient Light Music and Media player MS-Word, Excel and Powerpoint, PDF, ZIP compatible Organiser/Calender SMS, MMS, IM, Email Speaker Phone/Hands free Li-Po 1950 mAh battery Up to 400 hours Standby Up to 9 hours Talk Time
    • Price history Approx $99 AUD mid-2012 (Pre-paid)